I'm not sure how to answer this question.....
by

Your answer

Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.

2 Answers

Malthus argued that the human population was increasing at an exponential rate, and that under the best of conditions, food supplies would only increase linearly. Thus, he said that at some point, the population would become greater than the amount of food available to support it. So, there would be massive competition for the very limited resource of food.

 

Darwin extended this basic idea to say that all organisms are always competing for limited resources, and that any change which benefits an individual would be passed on to its descendents making them more fit and better able to survive and reproduce.
by Level 2 User (2.1k points)
Malthus described the effects of a rising human population and a limited supply of food, leading to the "Malthusian catastrophe" in which there were too many people and not enough food. Darwin applied this to all populations and saw that resources (or lack thereof) limit survival.
by

Related questions

1 answer
asked Apr 16, 2012 by anonymous | 296 views
0 answers
2 answers
asked Mar 28, 2012 by anonymous | 169 views
1,290 questions
1,126 answers
30 comments
9,786 users